Posted : 09/01/2000
Tanning is Contravolitional
by Donald L. Smith
Keep the words contravolitional and involuntary in mind the next time you read
an article by a member of the dermatology community stating that a tan indicates damage to
the skin. Never heard of the word contravolitional? It is defined as something that is
done in opposition to the will. Will is defined as the power of the mind to choose and
control its own actions. Therefore, a volitional activity would be one that can be
controlled by our thoughts and willpower and an involuntary activity is one performed
independently and without thinking.
Common Sense
In order to fully understand what we are talking about, let's take a look at the human
body. Certain bodily processes are contravolitional and they are performed without the
necessity of conscious thought. Good examples are breathing, the digestion of food, the
beating of our heart, temperature control and injury repair.
Two other functions that are contravolitional that are relevant to this article are
erythema (sunburn) and melanogenesis (tanning). All of these natural processes rely upon
the involuntary ability of the body to restore homeostasis. For those of you a few years
past your high-school biology class, homeostasis is a tendency toward stability in the
normal body states. Homeostasis is activated by the body's automatic feedback mechanism to
both internal and external stimuli.
One example of this process--when the body's temperature rises above 98.6 degrees F,
the homeostatic reaction is to cause us to perspire, breathe more deeply and make our
heart beat faster to increase our blood circulation rate.
The same is true when the body determines that our skin has been overexposed (defined
as a dose of UVR large enough to cause a sunburn) to UVR--the contravolitional reaction is
sunburn. This normal process causes swelling, reddening of the skin and other reactions
that all serve to protect our DNA from being damaged. The body then repairs the damage
done to the skin by the sunburn.
Likewise, when the body is exposed (defined as a dose of UVR below the level that will
cause a sunburn) to UVR, the contravolitional reaction is the process of melanogenesis--to
develop facultative pigmentation (a tan) and the thickening of the top layer of skin.
Imagine for a moment that you are comfortably laying in a tanning bed. Do you have to
take any voluntary action to start the process of tanning? The answer, of course, is no.
The process of UVR-induced melanogenesis is contravolitional. In fact, you couldn't stop
the process even if you tried.
That is why it is absolutely ludicrous for the dermatology community to suggest that
the contravolitional process of tanning is harmful. It is nothing more than the normal
homeostatic response to UVR by our body.
What is important is the level of the homeostatic response to UVR and if overexposed,
the result. However, sensible, moderate and responsible exposure to UVR results in the
development of facultative photo- protection pigmentation which serves to increase our
tolerance to UVR. Even prominent dermatologists have stated that both our natural skin
color and an acquired tan provide UVR protection; that tanned skin is three to five times
more resistant to UVR injury to the skin; and, the darkening of the skin during the
tanning process, the enhanced DNA repair capacity that results and possibly, other unknown
factors protect the skin from both acute (sunburn) and chronic (including the development
of skin cancer) UV damage.
Mother Nature Knows Best
When one considers all these facts, most people will agree that maintaining a
year-round tan makes good sense. Furthermore, they will realize that the sun-avoidance
message may be potentially damaging to all individuals except for skin type I individuals
who are genetically unable to tan. Likewise, the advice to apply an SPF 30 sunscreen every
day of the year, no matter the season or location, can be seen to benefit only the
manufacturers of products that contain sunscreen. If Mother Nature wanted us to use a
sunscreen, she wouldn't have provided us with the wonderful contravolitional ability to
tan.
|