Editor's note:
LOOKING FIT decided to print the following article immediately rather than waiting until
next month when it was scheduled due to its importance to tanning salon owners. The
Gilchrest and Eller article was written by respected dermatologists and published in a
prestigious medical journal. Moreover, the authors clearly state unambiguously that
UVR-induced melanogenesis (better known as tanning) provides protection against acute
(sunburn) and chronic (including skin cancer) skin damage. It will be interesting to see
what the anti-tanning segment of the dermatology community has to say about this important
article.
Mother Nature Knows Best
"Life on earth evolved in the presence of UVR irradiation from terrestrial
sunlight and essentially all organisms developed photoprotective mechanisms to limit the
resulting damage. In the case of human skin, two photoprotective mechanisms have been
recognized. (1) Melanin pigmentation, both constitutive (baseline) and facultative
(inducible), is the major recognized form of protection against UV-induced damage.
Photoprotection is attributable to the fact that the melanin polymer can directly absorb
UV photons, dissipating the otherwise injurious energy as heat, and can further absorb
free radical species generated by interaction of UV photons with cellular lipids and other
molecules that otherwise cause oxidative damage. (2) Scattering and reflection of UV
photons by proteins in the statum cornenum is known to thicken following UV radiation,
particularly in poorly melanized skin.
"Mammalian skin responds to UV irradiation by increased production of the pigment
melanin in melanocytes with subsequent distribution to surrounding keratinocytes in a
manner shown to be photoprotective. Also, recent data indicates that mammalian cells, like
bacterial cells, have a UV-inducible DNA repair capacity that further protects the tissue
from subsequent UV exposure. The combined effect of UV-induced melanogenesis and enhanced
DNA repair capacity as well as possibly other as yet poorly elucidated inducible
responses, is to render the skin far more resistant to subsequent UV injury. Such
responses can reasonably be presumed important in protecting skin from acute and chronic
UV damage including the development of skin cancer.
In addition, sun induced tanning is known to be photoprotective, with a sun protection
factor (SPF) of approximately three to five, depending on the individuals genetically
determined ability to tan."
The words above were not written by me, although they could have been because they
substantiate my "science of tanning" rationale for the benefits of sensible,
moderate and responsible exposure to UVR. Rather, they were written by Barbara A.
Gilchrest, M.D. and Mark S. Eller, M.D., of the Department of Dermatology at the Boston
University School of Medicine for an article published in the September 1999 issue of the
Symposium Proceedings (1999) of the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.
What Does This Article Mean?
I believe this article is just the first of many that will, perhaps without meaning to,
support the benefits of sensible, moderate and responsible exposure to UVR. This
especially is true since this article was written by respected members of the dermatology
community and published by a prestigious dermatology magazine. If they primarily are
concerned about their patient's welfare it is counterproductive for the American Academy
of Dermatology to continue ignoring evidence proving that the benefits of tanning far
outweigh the minimal and manageable risks involved.
Summary Of Gilchrest And Eller Article
In summary, the Gilchrest and Eller article says:
Both our natural skin color (constitutive pigmentation) and an acquired "tan"
(facultative pigmentation) provide protection against UV-induced damage to the skin.
UV photons directly are absorbed by melanin polymers which helps the body get rid of the
otherwise injurious energy as heat and the melanin polymers also can absorb potentially
damaging free radicals.
The thickening of the stratum corneum during the tanning process also provides
photoprotection, especially in individuals with lower phototypes/subtypes.
Tanned skin becomes far more resistant (by a factor of three to five times) to
subsequent ultraviolet radiation injury.
The darkening of the skin during the tanning process and the enhanced DNA repair
capacity that results (and possibly other unknown factors) can be presumed important in
protecting the skin from both acute (sunburn) and chronic (including the development of
skin cancer) UV damage.
The "bottom line" is that it matters not whether an individual is born with
darker natural skin color or acquires and maintains a "tan" at an indoor tanning
salon, the photoprotective benefits are the same. According to Gilchrest and Eller, these
benefits are not just limited to the prevention of erythema (sunburn), but specifically
include preventing the development of skin cancer.
Salon owners, make copies of this article and give them to your skeptical clients when
they question whether or not tanning provides photoprotection. Be sure to point out that
this article was based upon material published in a prestigious dermatology journal that
was written by respected members of the dermatology community.
The benefits of sensible, moderate and responsible exposure to UVR far outweigh the
minimal and manageable risks, especially when one considers the benefits of
photoprotection.
Donald L. Smith is executive director of The North American Alliance of Tanning
Salon Owners (TSO), an organization dedicated to looking out for the best interests of
tanning salon owners. For more information check out the Web site at www.naatso.org.